skirtcafe.org

Interesting dress from Prada, definately a unisex looking garment!

https://www.prada.com/gb/en/womens/days ... b1swE-ugqA

Also a very sad looking (male?) person, the dress in the womens section of prada clothes. So who knows?

Agreed. Hardly the look that would inspire me or make me think it was his choice -- more like made to wear it as a walk of shame; and the hair adds notihing positive. "interesting" -- maybe; "helpful" -- no at all.

I think a surly look might be trendy for some sectors of society.
I am interested if the term unisex is a euphemism for plain.

I seen this on facebook. Most of the comments were negative and ridiculing the poor guy for wearing a dress. Social media is evil.

DrFishnets wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2026 8:56 am I seen this on facebook. Most of the comments were negative and ridiculing the poor guy for wearing a dress. Social media is evil.

I think that's why social media is often referred to as antisocial media, its ironic how much extra gumption people have to be downright rude and insulting when the recipients have no real way of defending themselves. People who ridicule to that level are really not worth giving the time of day to as they are clearly cowards and very insecure.

yardstick wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2026 9:07 am

DrFishnets wrote: ↑Wed Apr 08, 2026 8:56 am I seen this on facebook. Most of the comments were negative and ridiculing the poor guy for wearing a dress. Social media is evil.

I think that's why social media is often referred to as antisocial media, its ironic how much extra gumption people have to be downright rude and insulting when the recipients have no real way of defending themselves. People who ridicule to that level are really not worth giving the time of day to as they are clearly cowards and very insecure.

He does look very unhappy at having to wear the dress. He looks like someone forced him to wear it. I'm still not entirely convinced he's a man because of the thickness of his arms and legs. To be clear: I'm not judging.
As for the dress.. it's a sack. Why do companies like Prada sell such clothes?

denimini wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2026 4:41 am I think a surly look might be trendy for some sectors of society.
I am interested if the term unisex is a euphemism for plain.

At £1,200 I don't seeing it interesting to me. It's to plain for that amount of money, even without 15% tariffs that would be charge for import.

We have been here before. I think it is a boyish looking female model.

I think most of the cost is for the label and the exclusive shops where it is sold. I pass these types of shops in parts of London, such as Bond Street and Slone street. https://www.prada.com/ww/en/store-locat ... /S103.html You will notice that you need to book an appointment to visit the shop. It is the world of some of my clients, who also buy expensive tech from me.